Written by Music

50 Cent Responds After Viral Explicit Video Claims Involving Daphne Joy and Diddy Spread Online

50 Cent has responded on social media after an alleged explicit video involving his former partner Daphne Joy began circulating widely online, with claims also linking Sean “Diddy” Combs to the footage. The rapper pushed back on the narrative forming around the situation, framing the impact not on the adults involved, but on their child.

Writing on X (formerly Twitter), he said: “She’s not a victim, SIRE is,” referring to his son with Joy. “Can you imagine going to eighth grade to find out this is your mom. The court system in LA thinks it’s fine.”

The comments came as the video — which has been widely shared across social platforms over the weekend — continues to drive speculation and commentary online. Reports circulating on social media claim the footage is approximately 40 minutes long and shows individuals in a dimly lit setting. The authenticity and full context of the material has not been independently verified.

Further claims online have suggested that the video involves Sean “Diddy” Combs alongside Daphne Joy and adult performer Sly Diggler. DJ Vlad of VladTV has also been cited in online discussions as having confirmed the video’s authenticity and referenced the individuals allegedly involved.

The situation has also resurfaced past comments from Sly Diggler, who in a 2025 interview with VladTV described encounters involving Combs and Joy. Those remarks have been widely recirculated in light of the current controversy, with users drawing connections between earlier interviews and the material now being shared.

As with many viral moments involving high-profile names, the story has quickly fractured across platforms, with speculation, reposted clips, and commentary blending into a fast-moving feed of claims and counterclaims.

At the centre of it, 50 Cent has focused his response on the personal fallout, specifically the impact on his son, rather than engaging directly with the broader allegations circulating online. The situation continues to unfold as social media drives much of the conversation, with no formal legal clarification publicly confirmed at the time of writing.

Last modified: June 2, 2026

Close